In a posting on the CNBC website, University of Maryland economist Peter Morici argued forcefully that inattention to the trade deficit is costing the Democrats this election.
"Without the second quarter jump in imports—led by consumer goods from China and boosted by an undervalued yuan and export subsidies President Obama neglects—GDP growth would be close to 5 percent, hundreds of thousands of Americans would be finding jobs, and Democrats would be poised to retain their majorities in the House and Senate."
It is a great disappointment that in spite of Obama's relatively strong rhetoric on trade during the campaign, his administration has done little to solve the trade deficit. The administration has done little to deserve the continued support of industrial workers, and this is likely to be reflected in broad losses in the Midwest this November.
Morici offers a solution that is very similar to our scaled tariff proposal:
"President Obama should impose a tax on dollar-yuan conversions in an amount equal to China’s currency market intervention divided by its exports—in 2009 that was about 35 percent. For imports, at least, that would offset Chinese subsidies that harm U.S. businesses and workers."
An important virtue of this type of proposal (which he does not note in the commentary) is that an automatic adjusting mechanism that ties our trade response to China's mercantilist actions makes it very difficult for China to retaliate with more mercantilism without hurting (further) its own exporters.
Comment by Howard Richman, 9/10/2010:
Actually, Peter Morici's proposal for a tax on dollar-yuan conversions came first, before our scaled tariff proposal. The two proposals may be very very similar. I just don't quite understand how Morici's proposal would work in practice. I can't find any place where he clarified exactly how it would work.
[An] extensive argument for balanced trade, and a program to achieve balanced trade is presented in Trading Away Our Future, by Raymond Richman, Howard Richman and Jesse Richman. “A minimum standard for ensuring that trade does benefit all is that trade should be relatively in balance.” [Balanced Trade entry]
Journal of Economic Literature:
[Trading Away Our Future] Examines the costs and benefits of U.S. trade and tax policies. Discusses why trade deficits matter; root of the trade deficit; the “ostrich” and “eagles” attitudes; how to balance trade; taxation of capital gains; the real estate tax; the corporate income tax; solving the low savings problem; how to protect one’s assets; and a program for a strong America....
Atlantic Economic Journal:
In Trading Away Our Future Richman ... advocates the immediate adoption of a set of public policy proposal designed to reduce the trade deficit and increase domestic savings.... the set of public policy proposals is a wake-up call... [February 17, 2009 review by T.H. Cate]