Ideal Taxes Association

Raymond Richman       -       Jesse Richman       -       Howard Richman

 Richmans' Trade and Taxes Blog



U.S. Trade Deficit Still Growing
Howard Richman, 9/10/2010

On Thursday, the Bureau of Economic Analysis released trade statistics which showed that the U.S. trade deficit fell in July. But the July data was along the same upward trend line as the February through May data.

The following chart shows the monthly U.S. trade deficits from 2009 (blue) and 2010 (red). This is the full trade deficit, including both goods and services, and has been calculated on a seasonally adjusted basis:

tradedeficitworldJuly2010.gif

About half of our trade deficit is our goods trade deficit with China. It is intentionally produced by the Chinese government as part of its successful mercantilist strategy, designed to maximize exports and minimize imports. That strategy was explored by Peking University professor Heng-Fu Zou in his article, Dynamic Analysis of the Viner Model of Mercantilism which appeared in the 1997 volume of Journal of International Money and Finance, and then implemented by the Chinese government at the beginning of this decade. Seeing the Chinese success, many other governments have been implementing the same mercantilist strategy.

The Chinese government uses yuan to buy dollars in foreign exchange markets to prevent the yuan from rising and the dollar from falling to a trade-balancing level. Then it loans those dollars to Americans. At the same time, it takes various measures to keep out American imports (tariffs, purchasing restrictions, freely permitting piracy while delaying legitimate items, etc.). Here is our trade deficit in just goods (not services) with China, not seasonally adjusted:

tradedeficitchinaJuly2010.gif

During the near-term, the mercantilist country loses consumption while the victim country gains it. For example, the Chinese worker has remained poor, despite the rapidly growing Chinese GDP. Meanwhile, in the United States, mercantilist governments supplied the loans which allowed the American consumer to borrow and live beyond his means until our housing bubble burst in 2006. During the Obama administration mercantilists have been supplying the loans which have been allowing the federal government to live beyond its means without causing much change in long-term interest rates.

But in the long run, the opposite happens: the mercantilist country gains consumption and the victim country loses it. China has been growing by about 10% per year. Meanwhile, its victim, the United States, loses industries, goes into debt, and its growth slows. The eventual result, as John Maynard Keynes predicted in his magnum opus, is a perpetual state of depression in the victim country, a state that we entered in the United States in the fourth quarter of 2007.

The Obama administration has been relying upon ineffective talk to persuade China to switch from the policies that have caused its economy to grow and ours to falter. Meanwhile China has been politely ignoring whatever Obama says. For example, last weekend President Obama dispatched Lawrence Summers to China to try to persuade the Chinese government to let its currency strengthen vs. the dollar. The  Chinese government gave Summers the royal treatment, including meetings with the head of the People's Bank of China and the Chinese President, but they did not make any concessions. Robert E. Scott, writing in the Huffington Post (Summers brings back bubkes from Beijing), wrote:

Larry Summers, Director of the National Economic Council, returned empty handed from meetings this week with Chinese President Hu Jintao and other senior government officials. Although China announced in June that it would allow its currency to fluctuate, the yuan has gained less than one half of one percent since then. Summers was officially rebuffed by a spokeswoman for China's Foreign Ministry, who said, "Our exchange rate reform can't be pressed ahead under external pressure." Time has run out on negotiations. The House Ways and Means and the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committees will both hold hearings next week on China currency and will consider tough legislation such as Congressman Tim Ryan and Tim Murphy's Currency Reform for Fair Trade Act (HR 2378) and similar legislation introduced by Senators Chuck Schumer and Lindsay Graham.

Now it's up to Congress to decide whether they want to continue to enable mercantilism. There are several excellent proposals on the table that would take the profit out of it. For example, University of Maryland economist Peter Morici (Obama, Pelosi Neglect of Trade Deficit Imperils Recovery) proposes a tax on mercantilist currency conversions. We propose a scaled tariff (U.S. Growth Slows Due to Trade Deficit) on our imports from mercantilist countries.

Congress is being held accountable by the American voter for the state of the American economy. The Democrats have been pretending to be concerned about the trade deficits, but when they have power, they do nothing. The Republican leadership does not even pretend to be concerned. Both parties need to decide whether or not they will continue Trading Away Our Future.

Your Name:

Post a Comment:


Comment by Mike from NYC, 9/11/2010: Unfortunately China is not the only 'villain' in the trade imbalance problem. Much of the blame can be laid at the feet of so-called American companies and capitalists who closed factories in the US and shipped the factories and manufacturing to China. Please name anything Black & Decker manufactures in the USA anymore. And how about WalMart? And what about Sears? The list is endless. Consider this: Corning is building a $800 MILLION factory in China and NOT in the US. American 'industrialists' of today are not the industrialists and captains of industry who led America to greatness. By and large they are mercantilists whose primary and sole aim is profits at any cost no matter the damage done to America. Let's face it - the 'heartbeat of America' has been ripped out and replaced with basically nothing. It was America's industrial sector that made America successful and despite all the rhetoric by politicians and capitalists there is nothing to replace it. The 'financial sector' did NOT make America so successful - it was factories and factory workers.




  • Richmans' Blog    RSS
  • Our New Book - Balanced Trade
  • Buy Trading Away Our Future
  • Read Trading Away Our Future
  • Richmans' Commentaries
  • ITA Working Papers
  • ITA on Facebook
  • Contact Us

    Archive
    Dec 2017
    Nov 2017
    Oct 2017
    Sep 2017
    Aug 2017
    Jul 2017
    Jun 2017
    May 2017
    Apr 2017
    Mar 2017
    Feb 2017
    Jan 2017
    Dec 2016
    Nov 2016
    Oct 2016
    Sep 2016
    Aug 2016
    Jul 2016
    Jun 2016
    May 2016
    Apr 2016
    Mar 2016
    Feb 2016
    Jan 2016
    Dec 2015
    Nov 2015
    Oct 2015
    Sep 2015
    Aug 2015
    Jul 2015
    Jun 2015
    May 2015
    Apr 2015
    Mar 2015
    Feb 2015
    Jan 2015
    Dec 2014
    Nov 2014
    Oct 2014
    Sep 2014
    Aug 2014
    Jul 2014
    Jun 2014
    May 2014
    Apr 2014
    Mar 2014
    Feb 2014
    Jan 2014
    Dec 2013
    Nov 2013
    Oct 2013
    Sep 2013
    Aug 2013
    Jul 2013
    Jun 2013
    May 2013
    Apr 2013
    Mar 2013
    Feb 2013
    Jan 2013
    Dec 2012
    Nov 2012
    Oct 2012
    Sep 2012
    Aug 2012
    Jul 2012
    Jun 2012
    May 2012
    Apr 2012
    Mar 2012
    Feb 2012
    Jan 2012
    Dec 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010

    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories:
    Book Reviews
    Capital Gains Taxation
    Corporate Income Tax
    Consumption Taxes
    Economy - Long Term
    Economy - Short Term
    Environmental Regulation
    Real Estate Taxation
    Trade

    Miscellaneous

    Outside Links:

  • American Economic Alert
  • American Jobs Alliance
  • Angry Bear Blog
  • Economy in Crisis
  • Econbrowser
  • Emmanuel Goldstein's Blog
  • Levy Economics Institute
  • McKeever Institute
  • Michael Pettis Blog
  • Naked Capitalism
  • Natural Born Conservative
  • Science & Public Policy Inst.
  • TradeReform.org
  • Votersway Blog
  • Watt's Up With That


    Wikipedia:

  • [An] extensive argument for balanced trade, and a program to achieve balanced trade is presented in Trading Away Our Future, by Raymond Richman, Howard Richman and Jesse Richman. “A minimum standard for ensuring that trade does benefit all is that trade should be relatively in balance.” [Balanced Trade entry]

    Journal of Economic Literature:

  • [Trading Away Our Future] Examines the costs and benefits of U.S. trade and tax policies. Discusses why trade deficits matter; root of the trade deficit; the “ostrich” and “eagles” attitudes; how to balance trade; taxation of capital gains; the real estate tax; the corporate income tax; solving the low savings problem; how to protect one’s assets; and a program for a strong America....

    Atlantic Economic Journal:

  • In Trading Away Our Future   Richman ... advocates the immediate adoption of a set of public policy proposal designed to reduce the trade deficit and increase domestic savings.... the set of public policy proposals is a wake-up call... [February 17, 2009 review by T.H. Cate]