Ideal Taxes Association

Raymond Richman       -       Jesse Richman       -       Howard Richman

 Richmans' Trade and Taxes Blog



Will improved trade deficit of October be temporary?
Howard Richman, 12/12/2010

According to statistics released on Friday, U.S. trade numbers improved in October. The U.S. monthly trade deficit in goods and services (seasonally adjusted) improved from $45.6 billion in September to $38.7 billion in October as shown in the graph below:

tradedeficitworldOct2010.gif

About half of the trade deficit is our goods trade deficit with China. That bilateral trade deficit also improved, as shown in the graph below:

tradedeficitchinaOct2010.gif

One reason for the improving U.S. trade deficit is that the U.S. economy is growing slower than its trading partners. The emerging market economies, including China, are growing especially rapidly at the moment, as shown in the graph below:

Bernanke1110Fig2.gif

When a country grows slower than its trading partners, its exports tend to grow faster than its imports. That's because trading partners' demand for imports grows faster than American demand for imports. Indeed, the October statistics show U.S. exports growing, while U.S. imports stay flat.

Another possible explanation could be the exchange rate of the dollar, which was especially weak in October. When the dollar weakens, American products become more competitive in U.S. and world markets and foreign products tend to become more expensive in American markets. If this is the dominant factor, then the improved trade deficit may not continue. Since November 1 the dollar has strengthened from $1.39 to $1.32 per euro and from 80.4 yen to 83.7 yen per dollar.

The emerging market governments have been working especially hard to keep their products competitive through currency manipulation. As the following graph shows, most have been devoting more than 3% of their countries' GDPs, over the last year, to the manipulation of exchange rates:

Bernanke1110Fig8.gif

Even Mexico and South Korea, countries that have or want free trade agreements with the U.S., have been manipulating exchange rates lately. These trading partners do so in order to increase their exports and reduce their imports. By doing so they increase our imports and reduce our exports. The United States government doesn't even object!

Which will win out? Will growing demand in the emerging market economies increase demand for American products, causing a continuing decline in the U.S. trade deficit and give us an export-led recovery? Or will growing currency manipulations by our trading partners prevent us from having much of a recovery at all?

One thing, for sure, the Chinese government does not intend to increase imports from the United States long-term. It is rapidly moving forward at the moment with government-production of commercial aircraft so that it won't have to permit aircraft imports from Boeing or Airbus. China is following the mercantilist strategy of maximizing exports while minimizing imports in order to grow in political power while bringing down the power of its trading partners.

Your Name:

Post a Comment:


Comment by Martin Davies, 12/14/2010:

Thankyou, Howard




  • Richmans' Blog    RSS
  • Our New Book - Balanced Trade
  • Buy Trading Away Our Future
  • Read Trading Away Our Future
  • Richmans' Commentaries
  • ITA Working Papers
  • ITA on Facebook
  • Contact Us

    Archive
    Sep 2017
    Aug 2017
    Jul 2017
    Jun 2017
    May 2017
    Apr 2017
    Mar 2017
    Feb 2017
    Jan 2017
    Dec 2016
    Nov 2016
    Oct 2016
    Sep 2016
    Aug 2016
    Jul 2016
    Jun 2016
    May 2016
    Apr 2016
    Mar 2016
    Feb 2016
    Jan 2016
    Dec 2015
    Nov 2015
    Oct 2015
    Sep 2015
    Aug 2015
    Jul 2015
    Jun 2015
    May 2015
    Apr 2015
    Mar 2015
    Feb 2015
    Jan 2015
    Dec 2014
    Nov 2014
    Oct 2014
    Sep 2014
    Aug 2014
    Jul 2014
    Jun 2014
    May 2014
    Apr 2014
    Mar 2014
    Feb 2014
    Jan 2014
    Dec 2013
    Nov 2013
    Oct 2013
    Sep 2013
    Aug 2013
    Jul 2013
    Jun 2013
    May 2013
    Apr 2013
    Mar 2013
    Feb 2013
    Jan 2013
    Dec 2012
    Nov 2012
    Oct 2012
    Sep 2012
    Aug 2012
    Jul 2012
    Jun 2012
    May 2012
    Apr 2012
    Mar 2012
    Feb 2012
    Jan 2012
    Dec 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010

    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories:
    Book Reviews
    Capital Gains Taxation
    Corporate Income Tax
    Consumption Taxes
    Economy - Long Term
    Economy - Short Term
    Environmental Regulation
    Real Estate Taxation
    Trade

    Miscellaneous

    Outside Links:

  • American Economic Alert
  • American Jobs Alliance
  • Angry Bear Blog
  • Economy in Crisis
  • Econbrowser
  • Emmanuel Goldstein's Blog
  • Levy Economics Institute
  • McKeever Institute
  • Michael Pettis Blog
  • Naked Capitalism
  • Natural Born Conservative
  • Science & Public Policy Inst.
  • TradeReform.org
  • Votersway Blog
  • Watt's Up With That


    Wikipedia:

  • [An] extensive argument for balanced trade, and a program to achieve balanced trade is presented in Trading Away Our Future, by Raymond Richman, Howard Richman and Jesse Richman. “A minimum standard for ensuring that trade does benefit all is that trade should be relatively in balance.” [Balanced Trade entry]

    Journal of Economic Literature:

  • [Trading Away Our Future] Examines the costs and benefits of U.S. trade and tax policies. Discusses why trade deficits matter; root of the trade deficit; the “ostrich” and “eagles” attitudes; how to balance trade; taxation of capital gains; the real estate tax; the corporate income tax; solving the low savings problem; how to protect one’s assets; and a program for a strong America....

    Atlantic Economic Journal:

  • In Trading Away Our Future   Richman ... advocates the immediate adoption of a set of public policy proposal designed to reduce the trade deficit and increase domestic savings.... the set of public policy proposals is a wake-up call... [February 17, 2009 review by T.H. Cate]