Ideal Taxes Association

Raymond Richman       -       Jesse Richman       -       Howard Richman

 Richmans' Trade and Taxes Blog



Is the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statisics "Lying" About Unemployment Claims?
Raymond Richman, 7/17/2011

The U.S. Department of Labor is headed by a political appointee, Hilda Solis. It is natural that she would want the President who appointed her to look good. Not that she would order the employment data to be doctored in any way.  However, she could ask the Bureau of Labor Statistics to present the data in a way that emphasizes “good” news, if possible. Whether or not any such request was made by the Secretary, the fact is that employment data that was released last week tends to emphasize the data most favorable to the President.

On Friday, July  15, 2011, the BLS reported the number of new unemployment claims filed during the week ending July 2nd, increased by 15,000 compared with the previous week. The first paragraph reported, “The advance number for seasonally adjusted insured unemployment during the week ending July 2 was 3,727,000, an increase of 15,000 from the preceding week's revised level of 3,712,000.” And that is what all the media reported.  But that was not the actual number of claims filed. The actual numbers were reported in the second paragraph.

The BLS report of unemployment insurance claims for the week ending July 9, unadjusted, totaled 470,671,  an increase of 45,031 from the previous week, not 15,000. The media reported only the data in the leading paragraph.

We see no reason for the Department of Labor to report the seasonally adusted  figures at all. If the Bureau wants to put a more favorable light on the data, it ought to say that some of the increase may have been due to a seasonable increase in unemployment. The truth is it does not know whether the increase was the result of seasonal factors or not. All it knows is that in the past there were seasonal layoffs in July. We are even skekptical about that! We suspect that the bulk of the increased layoffs had little to do with seasonal factors. What seasonal factors are at play? Surely not in education; that affected the June data. These are not ordinary times. The trade deficit increased in May. American manufacturers were affected adversely because imports grew faster than exports. The Bureau of Economic Analysis of the Department of Commerce made no “seasonal adjustment” in reporting the May data.  

The figure that the BLS gave of 405,000 claims is non-existent; it is an adjustment of the actual number of claims, 470,671, which was the number actually filed. It may well be that some of those who lost their jobs during the week of July 2 to July 9 were in what the BLS considers seasonal employment. What seasonal adjustment occurs in July? We believe the BLS seasonal adjustment is merely a guess. The BLS did not report what years were used to determine the seasonal adjustments. The public should be skeptical of any “adjustment” when the actual number is known.

Your Name:

Post a Comment:


Comment by M, 7/21/2011:

To be fair to the Obama administration, they have championed extended benefits for unemployed workers. This has allowed a more accurate picture of the actual unemployment rate to be revealed. Usually, all administrations allow benefits to expire, and thus the "official" unemployment rate is decreased. That the actualy rate of unemployed and under employed people is higher than the official rate, is not exceptional.


Comment by George, 8/7/2011:

Unfortunately, the BLS has become a political tool to validate numbers in a best scenario collection of samples (data). The BEA (Bureau of Economic Assessment) does the same. The statistics produce by these agencies have become worthless. If you attempt to validate BLS numbers from other sources with different mathematical methods the numbers just do no add up. 


Comment by Scott Walker, 2/4/2012:

A wise man once said--there are lies, d**n lies, and statistics.  As we move into the general election campaign season, we can unfortunately expect greater use of slanted statistics from both sides of the aisle.  The American voter will need to be constantly checking the sources of data used to illustrate Obama's track record as President. 




  • Richmans' Blog    RSS
  • Our New Book - Balanced Trade
  • Buy Trading Away Our Future
  • Read Trading Away Our Future
  • Richmans' Commentaries
  • ITA Working Papers
  • ITA on Facebook
  • Contact Us

    Archive
    Mar 2017
    Feb 2017
    Jan 2017
    Dec 2016
    Nov 2016
    Oct 2016
    Sep 2016
    Aug 2016
    Jul 2016
    Jun 2016
    May 2016
    Apr 2016
    Mar 2016
    Feb 2016
    Jan 2016
    Dec 2015
    Nov 2015
    Oct 2015
    Sep 2015
    Aug 2015
    Jul 2015
    Jun 2015
    May 2015
    Apr 2015
    Mar 2015
    Feb 2015
    Jan 2015
    Dec 2014
    Nov 2014
    Oct 2014
    Sep 2014
    Aug 2014
    Jul 2014
    Jun 2014
    May 2014
    Apr 2014
    Mar 2014
    Feb 2014
    Jan 2014
    Dec 2013
    Nov 2013
    Oct 2013
    Sep 2013
    Aug 2013
    Jul 2013
    Jun 2013
    May 2013
    Apr 2013
    Mar 2013
    Feb 2013
    Jan 2013
    Dec 2012
    Nov 2012
    Oct 2012
    Sep 2012
    Aug 2012
    Jul 2012
    Jun 2012
    May 2012
    Apr 2012
    Mar 2012
    Feb 2012
    Jan 2012
    Dec 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July

    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories:
    Book Reviews
    Capital Gains Taxation
    Corporate Income Tax
    Consumption Taxes
    Economy - Long Term
    Economy - Short Term

    Environmental Regulation
    Real Estate Taxation
    Trade
    Miscellaneous

    Outside Links:

  • American Economic Alert
  • American Jobs Alliance
  • Angry Bear Blog
  • Economy in Crisis
  • Econbrowser
  • Emmanuel Goldstein's Blog
  • Levy Economics Institute
  • McKeever Institute
  • Michael Pettis Blog
  • Naked Capitalism
  • Natural Born Conservative
  • Science & Public Policy Inst.
  • TradeReform.org
  • Votersway Blog
  • Watt's Up With That


    Wikipedia:

  • [An] extensive argument for balanced trade, and a program to achieve balanced trade is presented in Trading Away Our Future, by Raymond Richman, Howard Richman and Jesse Richman. “A minimum standard for ensuring that trade does benefit all is that trade should be relatively in balance.” [Balanced Trade entry]

    Journal of Economic Literature:

  • [Trading Away Our Future] Examines the costs and benefits of U.S. trade and tax policies. Discusses why trade deficits matter; root of the trade deficit; the “ostrich” and “eagles” attitudes; how to balance trade; taxation of capital gains; the real estate tax; the corporate income tax; solving the low savings problem; how to protect one’s assets; and a program for a strong America....

    Atlantic Economic Journal:

  • In Trading Away Our Future   Richman ... advocates the immediate adoption of a set of public policy proposal designed to reduce the trade deficit and increase domestic savings.... the set of public policy proposals is a wake-up call... [February 17, 2009 review by T.H. Cate]