On December 29, S&P Case-Shiller published its October estimate of average house prices using sales and resales of the same houses to make their estimate. The latest data shows the continuing fall in real house prices since June 2010 shown in the graph below:
The latest data agrees with our prediction of how fast house prices would fall. Specifically, in the April 14, 2011, American Thinker (House Prices in Free Fall) we wrote:
If current trends continue, real house prices (house prices after subtracting inflation) will likely lose about a quarter of their real value over the next 4 years.
At the time we made our prediction, the latest Case-Shiller data (10 city composite, seasonally adjusted) was the January 2011 data. Over the 9 months since we made that prediction, real house prices have declined by 4.7%. If extrapolated to a year, this would equal a 6.3% fall per year, which is on track toward our prediction of house prices losing about 25% in value over the next four years.
It is clear (as we predicted at the time) that the Bernanke-Obama attempts to stabilize house prices through massive interventions in the mortgage and house buying markets only caused a temporary rise in real house prices which lasted from June 2009 to June 2010. It was a huge waste of government resources. Governments should not fight wars against the laws of supply and demand.
Even more foolish was the Clinton-Gingrich mistake of ending the roll-over treatment of capital gains for home sales in 1997. This tax change encouraged the speculation which set off the house price bubble in 1998. The popping of that bubble has helped depress the American economy since 2006, and will likely continue to help depress the American economy for another three years.
Comment by curtalonso, 1/2/2012:
If you move and sell the home before you have recouped the costs, you won't end up receiving a financial benefit from refinancing. Use our refinance calculator to help you decide. Check out 123 Refinance calculator to find your refi rates in seconds.
[An] extensive argument for balanced trade, and a program to achieve balanced trade is presented in Trading Away Our Future, by Raymond Richman, Howard Richman and Jesse Richman. “A minimum standard for ensuring that trade does benefit all is that trade should be relatively in balance.” [Balanced Trade entry]
Journal of Economic Literature:
[Trading Away Our Future] Examines the costs and benefits of U.S. trade and tax policies. Discusses why trade deficits matter; root of the trade deficit; the “ostrich” and “eagles” attitudes; how to balance trade; taxation of capital gains; the real estate tax; the corporate income tax; solving the low savings problem; how to protect one’s assets; and a program for a strong America....
Atlantic Economic Journal:
In Trading Away Our Future Richman ... advocates the immediate adoption of a set of public policy proposal designed to reduce the trade deficit and increase domestic savings.... the set of public policy proposals is a wake-up call... [February 17, 2009 review by T.H. Cate]