Ideal Taxes Association

Raymond Richman       -       Jesse Richman       -       Howard Richman

 Richmans' Trade and Taxes Blog



Geithner thinks his failed trade policy was a success
Howard Richman, 4/30/2012

In November 2010, when it became clear that his recovery summer had failed, Lawrence Summers resigned as Director of President Obama's National Economic Council. In contrast, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner still hasn't figured out that he has failed.

In a speech at the Commonwealth Club of California on April 26, Geithner claimed that the Obama administration's trade policy has succeeded, despite the 25 months of falling net goods exports with China shown in the graph below:

ChinaTradeThru0212.gif

Near the beginning of the speech, he said:

But parts of the world, and particularly emerging markets, have been a source of strength for the United States since the crisis. China has been a significant part of this growth. Overall, American exports have increased about 34 percent since 2009. American workers and American companies are becoming more competitive, productivity is up, supported by rapid increases in private investment, financed by a recovering financial system.

But the above paragraph contains three questionable claims:

  1. Rapid increases in private investment? Geithner is two quarters late in his bragging. Fixed investment indeed grew at a 12.4% annual rate in the third quarter of 2011, but by the first quarter of 2012 it had slowed to a paltry 1.4% annual rate increase.


  2. The emerging market economies are helping the United States? They are almost all following China's currency manipulation strategy so that they grow rapidly while Europe and America stagnate. Bernanke explained all of this in his November 17 2010 speech in Frankfurt Germany.


  3. Growing exports a good sign even though imports were growing faster? When trade is out of balance, it is net exports (exports minus imports) that determine the contribution of foreign trade to an economy. Negative net exports subtract from aggregate demand and income.

If trade were balanced, the growth in exports cited by Geithner would indeed be a positive indicator. It would show that the United States was making greater use of its own comparative advantages to trade for what it produces less efficiently. But when trade is kept out-of-balance by currency-manipulating trading partners, our trading partners get our industry and investment while we get consumer baubles and debt.

Then later in the speech Geithner congratulated himself on the baby steps China had taken in the right direction, ignoring the fact that these steps had no noticeable effect upon the deteriorating net exports shown in the above graph.

Geithner's failure was totally predictable.  All one needed do is read this starry-eyed statement from his Senate confirmation hearing at the beginning of 2009:

More generally, the best approach to ensure that countries do not engage in manipulating their currencies is to demonstrate that the disadvantages of doing so outweigh the benefits. If confirmed, I look forward to a constructive dialogue with our trading partners around the world in which Treasury makes the fact-based case that market exchange rates are a central ingredient to healthy and sustained growth.

Instead of insisting upon balanced trade because it was in America's best interest, he told America's emerging market trading partners that he wanted to do what was best for them. Indeed he did. The Chinese government gained economic power, industry and economic growth at America's expense. It proved to the Chinese people that totalitarianism works and that American democracy does not.

The result has been an economic disaster of the highest order for the United States: (1) continuing loss of American economic power, (2) high unemployment rate that has continued and continued, and (3) a failed recovery in 2010  due to growing trade deficits. It was economic incompetence at its worst. On Thursday, Geithner tried to defend it. But it is indefensible.

Your Name:

Post a Comment:


Comment by SEO News, 10/9/2012:

If you live in USA and its great idea to invesment your capital in this country because if you invest money then you have a better chance to get more money from your investment. 




  • Richmans' Blog    RSS
  • Our New Book - Balanced Trade
  • Buy Trading Away Our Future
  • Read Trading Away Our Future
  • Richmans' Commentaries
  • ITA Working Papers
  • ITA on Facebook
  • Contact Us

    Archive
    Aug 2014
    Jul 2014
    Jun 2014
    May 2014
    Apr 2014
    Mar 2014
    Feb 2014
    Jan 2014
    Dec 2013
    Nov 2013
    Oct 2013
    Sep 2013
    Aug 2013
    Jul 2013
    Jun 2013
    May 2013
    Apr 2013
    Mar 2013
    Feb 2013
    Jan 2013
    Dec 2012
    Nov 2012
    Oct 2012
    Sep 2012
    Aug 2012
    Jul 2012
    Jun 2012
    May 2012
    Apr 2012

    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories:
    Book Reviews
    Capital Gains Taxation
    Corporate Income Tax
    Consumption Taxes
    Economy - Long Term
    Economy - Short Term
    Environmental Regulation
    Real Estate Taxation
    Trade

    Miscellaneous

    Outside Links:

  • American Economic Alert
  • American Jobs Alliance
  • Angry Bear Blog
  • Economy in Crisis
  • Econbrowser
  • Emmanuel Goldstein's Blog
  • Levy Economics Institute
  • McKeever Institute
  • Michael Pettis Blog
  • Naked Capitalism
  • Natural Born Conservative
  • Science & Public Policy Inst.
  • TradeReform.org
  • Votersway Blog
  • Watt's Up With That


    Wikipedia:

  • [An] extensive argument for balanced trade, and a program to achieve balanced trade is presented in Trading Away Our Future, by Raymond Richman, Howard Richman and Jesse Richman. “A minimum standard for ensuring that trade does benefit all is that trade should be relatively in balance.” [Balanced Trade entry]

    Journal of Economic Literature:

  • [Trading Away Our Future] Examines the costs and benefits of U.S. trade and tax policies. Discusses why trade deficits matter; root of the trade deficit; the “ostrich” and “eagles” attitudes; how to balance trade; taxation of capital gains; the real estate tax; the corporate income tax; solving the low savings problem; how to protect one’s assets; and a program for a strong America....

    Atlantic Economic Journal:

  • In Trading Away Our Future   Richman ... advocates the immediate adoption of a set of public policy proposal designed to reduce the trade deficit and increase domestic savings.... the set of public policy proposals is a wake-up call... [February 17, 2009 review by T.H. Cate]