Ideal Taxes Association

Raymond Richman       -       Jesse Richman       -       Howard Richman

 Richmans' Trade and Taxes Blog

Obama asking for more balanced trade with China
Howard Richman, 12/20/2012

Early in President Obama's first administration, he dispatched Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to China, not to insist on trade balance, but to beg the Chinese government for loans. The Taipei Times reported on February 23, 2009: "In Beijing, [Clinton] called on Chinese authorities to continue buying U.S. Treasuries, saying it would help jump-start the U.S. economy and stimulate imports of Chinese goods."

President Obama is starting his second term on a different note. The Associated Press reports:

WASHINGTON — The U.S. is seeking a more balanced trade relationship with China at talks Wednesday that could set the tone for cooperation after political transitions in the world’s two largest economies.

The annual joint commission on commerce and trade meeting comes weeks after President Barack Obama’s re-election and the elevation of new leaders of China’s ruling Communist Party.

Few concrete outcomes are expected, but Washington will be looking for signs of the economic policy direction under new Chinese leader Xi Jinping. The U.S. wants China to stimulate domestic demand and become less reliant on export growth and allow more market access for American companies.

Meanwhile, the US merchandise trade deficit with China (negative net exports) continues to worsen, hitting $311.6 billion over the 12 months ending in October as shown by the graph below:


The merchandise trade deficit of the graph only includes the goods trade. The United States has a compensating service trade surplus with China of $15.3 billion in 2011. Assuming the same level in 2012, our total trade deficit with China for the last 12 months was about $295 billion, about 58% of our total trade deficit.

How China Does It

China keeps out American exports through a wide variety of barriers. For example, in December 2011 they raised their already high tariffs of about 25% on American automobile exports, forcing Cadillac and Jeep to build their new factories in China in order to have continuing access to the Chinese automobile market.

But China's main technique for growing its trade surplus with the United States is currency manipulation. The Chinese government buys hundreds of billions of dollars worth of foreign currencies each year in foreign exchange markets. According to the Asian Development Bank, the People's Bank of China added $669.8 billion to its foreign currency reserves (and related items) in 2011. 

Meanwhile, the increased demand for the dollar and the increased supply of yuan in foreign exchange markets, caused by China's foreign currency purchases, keeps the dollar at a high exchange rate, and keeps the yuan at a low exchange rate. As a result, American producers continue to experience artificially reduced market share in U.S. and foreign markets while Chinese producers continue to experience artificially increased market share in U.S. and foreign markets.

The foreign savings flowing into the United States, largely from China, shifts the supply of savings in the U.S. to to the right, but at the same time it takes away investment opportunities for American producers, which shifts demand for investment to the left. The shift to the right in savings and the shift to the left in investment are illustrated in the supply-demand graph of the loanable funds market below:


The Scaled Tariff could be the Solution

My father, son and I have a WTO-legal solution. We have invented the scaled tariff, a tariff designed to balance trade. It is adjusted so as to take in half our trade deficit with each trading partner as US government revenue. It goes up when the trade deficit goes up, down when it goes down, and disappears when trade approaches balance with each country. Also the whole tariff disappears when overall US trade approaches balance.

It helps comparative advantage because the implicit assumption behind comparative advantage is that trade is balanced. And the scaled tariff balances trade.

If trade is balanced, we trade a basket of products that we produce with comparative advantage for a basket of products that others produce with comparative advantage and everybody benefits.

Currently, China is producing what it produces with comparative advantage and what we produce with comparative advantage and only trading with us for products that they can't produce at all, such as grains, coal and natural gas.

The immediate effect of the scaled tariff would be to cause America to buy more from Canada and Brazil, countries that buy more from us when we buy more from them.

The slightly delayed effect is that the Chinese government changes its policies, decides to let in imports from the US after all. It decides to do so in order to keep market share for its exports in American markets.

The growth in investment opportunities in America's export-producing sectors would be enormous. The only danger is that interest rates would go up too much. But that wouldn't be the case if we instituted the scaled tariff at the same time that we brought budgets toward balance.

The Obama administration is finally asking China to bring trade toward balance. If China refuses, President Obama may have to take stronger action. He could insure balance by imposing the scaled tariff.

Your Name:

Post a Comment:

Comment by Tex, 12/22/2012:

with all due respect, this blog could be much more visually appealing to the passersby. very good information and good opinions, in my opinion, as it were; however it part of your goal is to have more people read and comment then the aesthetic appeal must be addressed. at any rate...not meaning to sound harsh, just honest. as mentioned, excellent information and opinions.

  • Richmans' Blog    RSS
  • Our New Book - Balanced Trade
  • Buy Trading Away Our Future
  • Read Trading Away Our Future
  • Richmans' Commentaries
  • ITA Working Papers
  • ITA on Facebook
  • Contact Us

    Sep 2021
    May 2021
    Apr 2021
    Feb 2021
    Jan 2021
    Dec 2020
    Nov 2020
    Oct 2020
    Jul 2020
    Jun 2020
    May 2020
    Apr 2020
    Mar 2020
    Dec 2019
    Nov 2019
    Oct 2019
    Sep 2019
    Aug 2019
    Jun 2019
    May 2019
    Apr 2019
    Mar 2019
    Feb 2019
    Jan 2019
    Dec 2018
    Nov 2018
    Aug 2018
    Jul 2018
    Jun 2018
    May 2018
    Apr 2018
    Mar 2018
    Feb 2018
    Dec 2017
    Nov 2017
    Oct 2017
    Sep 2017
    Aug 2017
    Jul 2017
    Jun 2017
    May 2017
    Apr 2017
    Mar 2017
    Feb 2017
    Jan 2017
    Dec 2016
    Nov 2016
    Oct 2016
    Sep 2016
    Aug 2016
    Jul 2016
    Jun 2016
    May 2016
    Apr 2016
    Mar 2016
    Feb 2016
    Jan 2016
    Dec 2015
    Nov 2015
    Oct 2015
    Sep 2015
    Aug 2015
    Jul 2015
    Jun 2015
    May 2015
    Apr 2015
    Mar 2015
    Feb 2015
    Jan 2015
    Dec 2014
    Nov 2014
    Oct 2014
    Sep 2014
    Aug 2014
    Jul 2014
    Jun 2014
    May 2014
    Apr 2014
    Mar 2014
    Feb 2014
    Jan 2014
    Dec 2013
    Nov 2013
    Oct 2013
    Sep 2013
    Aug 2013
    Jul 2013
    Jun 2013
    May 2013
    Apr 2013
    Mar 2013
    Feb 2013
    Jan 2013
    Dec 2012

    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Book Reviews
    Capital Gains Taxation
    Corporate Income Tax
    Consumption Taxes
    Economy - Long Term
    Economy - Short Term
    Environmental Regulation
    Last 100 Years
    Real Estate Taxation


    Outside Links:

  • American Economic Alert
  • American Jobs Alliance
  • Angry Bear Blog
  • Economy in Crisis
  • Econbrowser
  • Emmanuel Goldstein's Blog
  • Levy Economics Institute
  • McKeever Institute
  • Michael Pettis Blog
  • Naked Capitalism
  • Natural Born Conservative
  • Science & Public Policy Inst.
  • Votersway Blog
  • Watt's Up With That


  • [An] extensive argument for balanced trade, and a program to achieve balanced trade is presented in Trading Away Our Future, by Raymond Richman, Howard Richman and Jesse Richman. “A minimum standard for ensuring that trade does benefit all is that trade should be relatively in balance.” [Balanced Trade entry]

    Journal of Economic Literature:

  • [Trading Away Our Future] Examines the costs and benefits of U.S. trade and tax policies. Discusses why trade deficits matter; root of the trade deficit; the “ostrich” and “eagles” attitudes; how to balance trade; taxation of capital gains; the real estate tax; the corporate income tax; solving the low savings problem; how to protect one’s assets; and a program for a strong America....

    Atlantic Economic Journal:

  • In Trading Away Our Future   Richman ... advocates the immediate adoption of a set of public policy proposal designed to reduce the trade deficit and increase domestic savings.... the set of public policy proposals is a wake-up call... [February 17, 2009 review by T.H. Cate]