Ideal Taxes Association

Raymond Richman       -       Jesse Richman       -       Howard Richman

 Richmans' Trade and Taxes Blog



Blacks Do Poorly Under Obama's Stimulus Policies
Raymond Richman, 6/5/2013

It is generally believed that blacks have fared well under Obama but the truth is that Obama’s policies have made blacks worse off.  A black scholar, Dr. Reginald Clark, points out that every racial group, except the blacks, has benefitted, however moderately, since 2009.  He writes that “since 2009 Blacks are the only group that has taken a definitive step BACKWARDS since then.” This continues to be true as the following table shows:  

                             Unemployment Rates

Census Release, May 13, 2013 

Unemployment Rates                          Apr. 2012      Apr. 2013 

Total 16 and over                                     8.1              7.5

Teenagers                                              24.9             24.1

White                                                      7.4               6.7 

Black                                                     13.1             13.2 

Asian                                                       5.2             5.1

Hispanic                                                 10.3             9.0 

Obama’s economic policies have resulted in no increase in manufacturing. He has increased demand by subsidizing wind and solar plants in areas where few blacks live. Excessive government regulation and high taxes on unsubsidized industries have induced many American manufacturers to outsource the production of their products. Many leading manufacturers have more employees abroad than they have here. A recent example is Apple Corp. which paid no U.S. taxes at all. The Environment Protection Agency has issued regulations that punishes enterprises that produce and consume fossil fuels. Obama’s promotion of foolish policies to prevent global warming, and his anti-free market policies have reduced job opportunities. American manufacturing has been stagnating. They were in addition exempted from income taxes on their profits.

These policies have been of primary benefit to the wealthy. Al Gore became a multimillionaire promoting wind and solar projects. Huge subsidies were paid to construct wind and solar energy facilities and utilities were forced to buy and pay high prices for the energy they produced. Needless to say these costs were passed on to households and corporations. Instead of reducing wasteful expenditures, Obama chose to raise taxes on interest and capital gains and increased the rates of the individual income tax.  Needless to say, manufacturers took notice.

Auto manufacturers were subsidized to promote high priced hybrid and electric autos and the buyers of those expensive vehicles were subsidized.   Billions were paid to homeowners for energy-saving home improvements. Auto buyers were paid for the “junkers” they traded in. But the federal government required them to be recycled as junk and in effect prevented their being sold as used cars. This had the effect of raising used car prices. This raised the costs of transportation of low-income families. The middle and upper classes generally buy new cars or high-priced used cars.

The billions wasted ought to have gone to create new permanent manufacturing jobs. These and more foolish subsidies resulted in jobs but none that are permanent. The subsidies created a few jobs in wind and solar plants in areas inhabited by few blacks and in the auto and home repair industries but none that would outlast the subsidies. As a result, few job opportunities for blacks were created.

The employment opportunities for teen-age blacks were diminished by Obama’s raising the minimum wage. How bad the situation was for teen-age Blacks is described in an article written by Bonnie Kavoussi (Black Teen Unemployment Rate Rises to 47 Percent in February) in the Huffington Post on March 8:

The U.S. unemployment rate fell to 7.7 percent in February, the Labor Department reported on Friday. That's still rather high, but it's nothing compared to what black teens are grappling with: an unemployment rate that grew to 43%.

That's higher than when the recession ended. It's also substantially higher than in November 2007, right before the recession started. Back then, the black teen unemployment rate -- teen being defined as anyone between the ages of 16 and 19 years old -- was 28.9 percent, according to Labor Department data.

President Obama isn’t helping black people economically.

Your Name:

Post a Comment:


Comment by Frank, 6/19/2013:

Why report on the legacy of blacks under Obama policies. They don't care so why should we.




  • Richmans' Blog    RSS
  • Our New Book - Balanced Trade
  • Buy Trading Away Our Future
  • Read Trading Away Our Future
  • Richmans' Commentaries
  • ITA Working Papers
  • ITA on Facebook
  • Contact Us

    Archive
    Apr 2017
    Mar 2017
    Feb 2017
    Jan 2017
    Dec 2016
    Nov 2016
    Oct 2016
    Sep 2016
    Aug 2016
    Jul 2016
    Jun 2016
    May 2016
    Apr 2016
    Mar 2016
    Feb 2016
    Jan 2016
    Dec 2015
    Nov 2015
    Oct 2015
    Sep 2015
    Aug 2015
    Jul 2015
    Jun 2015
    May 2015
    Apr 2015
    Mar 2015
    Feb 2015
    Jan 2015
    Dec 2014
    Nov 2014
    Oct 2014
    Sep 2014
    Aug 2014
    Jul 2014
    Jun 2014
    May 2014
    Apr 2014
    Mar 2014
    Feb 2014
    Jan 2014
    Dec 2013
    Nov 2013
    Oct 2013
    Sep 2013
    Aug 2013
    Jul 2013
    Jun 2013

    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories:
    Book Reviews
    Capital Gains Taxation
    Corporate Income Tax
    Consumption Taxes
    Economy - Long Term

    Economy - Short Term
    Environmental Regulation
    Real Estate Taxation
    Trade
    Miscellaneous

    Outside Links:

  • American Economic Alert
  • American Jobs Alliance
  • Angry Bear Blog
  • Economy in Crisis
  • Econbrowser
  • Emmanuel Goldstein's Blog
  • Levy Economics Institute
  • McKeever Institute
  • Michael Pettis Blog
  • Naked Capitalism
  • Natural Born Conservative
  • Science & Public Policy Inst.
  • TradeReform.org
  • Votersway Blog
  • Watt's Up With That


    Wikipedia:

  • [An] extensive argument for balanced trade, and a program to achieve balanced trade is presented in Trading Away Our Future, by Raymond Richman, Howard Richman and Jesse Richman. “A minimum standard for ensuring that trade does benefit all is that trade should be relatively in balance.” [Balanced Trade entry]

    Journal of Economic Literature:

  • [Trading Away Our Future] Examines the costs and benefits of U.S. trade and tax policies. Discusses why trade deficits matter; root of the trade deficit; the “ostrich” and “eagles” attitudes; how to balance trade; taxation of capital gains; the real estate tax; the corporate income tax; solving the low savings problem; how to protect one’s assets; and a program for a strong America....

    Atlantic Economic Journal:

  • In Trading Away Our Future   Richman ... advocates the immediate adoption of a set of public policy proposal designed to reduce the trade deficit and increase domestic savings.... the set of public policy proposals is a wake-up call... [February 17, 2009 review by T.H. Cate]