Ideal Taxes Association

Raymond Richman       -       Jesse Richman       -       Howard Richman

 Richmans' Trade and Taxes Blog

Reading the Tea Leaves in Virginia
Jesse Richman, 11/7/2013

Last night the votes were counted in Virginia's state-wide elections for Governor, Lt. Governor, and Attorney General along with all members of the House of Delegates.  The results defy the strong interpretations partisans of all stripes and on all sides would like to read into them. The electorate, in the end, fits no one's ideological box, and serves no party's crusade. 

Some Republicans are inclined to read in Cuccinelli's loss an upset driven by the Libertarian candidate.  But the Sarvis as spoiler line doesn't withstand basic scrutiny.  There was no Libertarian on the ballot for the two other state-wide races, both of them races that (with the same electorate) Republicans appear to have lost.  The outcome therefore rests more squarely on the major party candidates, their campaigns, and their positions.  

On the whole it was a good night for Democrats in the state-wide races.  McAuliffe and Northam won -- Democrats will hold both the Governor's mansion and the Lt. Governor's key swing vote in the state Senate. Pending a recount in the extremely close Attorney's General race, Democrats may capture that office as well.  

But Democrats who hoped to read in the election a dramatic repudiation of the Tea Party didn't get it.  The margin of victory was simply too small.  Republicans maintained a very solid -- nearly two to one -- advantage in the House of Delegates, and the victory margin for McAuliffe was much narrower than most of the polls had predicted. Late deciders and late mobilization swung decisively toward Cuccinelli as the extent of the health exchange implementation train wreck began to be apparent.  

On Obamacare, there must be a number of Democratic Senators privately wishing they had acceded to the House's final pre-shutdown offer that the individual mandate merely be delayed by a year.  It would have saved Democrats hours of heartburn Tuesday night by taking some of the pressure off a health exchange system not yet ready for prime time.  Yet the fact that Cuccinelli still lost should give pause to Republicans who think they can win on the issue in 2014 and 2016.  Everything depends upon the way the exchange system works over the next several months. That jury is still out. 

There are some key takeaways from this election though.  

1. Candidates matter.  Given the flaws in McAuliffe's candidacy, the parlor game of imagining a different outcome had Bill Bolling led the Republican ticket seems at least plausible.  Cuccinelli's abrasive pursuit of absolutes generated enmities and enemies that a more prudent pursuit of similar principles would not have done. 

2. Voter mobilization matters.  McAuliffe consciously sought to emulate the community organizer and volunteer based turnout machine Obama built in 2008 and 2012.  It worked.  Republicans' continued failure to emulate the Democratic model is at their great peril.  Belated Republican efforts to learn from the political science research on which the Obama machine was built may begin to bear fruit in upcoming elections, but they didn't here in Virginia. Democrats were visible and engaged on campus and in the community.  Republicans were often awol. 

3. Money matters. McAuliffe was able to win (and build his campaign machine) in part through his ability to access much more campaign money.  The need to raise money will continue to shape our politics in significant ways. 

4. Ethics matter.  Were it not for the Star Scientific scandal swirling around the Governor's mansion, Cuccinelli's campaign strategy would have worked much better.  And given the margin, he could well have won.  Hopefully McAuliffe will take up Cuccinelli's call for a special session of the General Assembly to amend and improve Virginia's disclosure and ethics laws.  Voters' trust (and election outcomes) are at stake when politicians dance to the edge of corruption with their 'friends' the big political donors.  Better and stronger rules are needed.

5. Virginia's appetite for negative political commercials has been sated.  Cuccinelli and McAuliffe took each other down so successfully that they motivated more than 140 thousand Virginians to vote for a third party candidate many knew little about.  Although pointing out the opponent's flaws and unpopular positions is an essential part of the democratic process, an exclusive focus on the opposition's limitations will send the electorate in search of new options, and it also deprives the winner of a clear mandate to lead the state anywhere. 

Your Name:

Post a Comment:

  • Richmans' Blog    RSS
  • Our New Book - Balanced Trade
  • Buy Trading Away Our Future
  • Read Trading Away Our Future
  • Richmans' Commentaries
  • ITA Working Papers
  • ITA on Facebook
  • Contact Us

    Sep 2021
    May 2021
    Apr 2021
    Feb 2021
    Jan 2021
    Dec 2020
    Nov 2020
    Oct 2020
    Jul 2020
    Jun 2020
    May 2020
    Apr 2020
    Mar 2020
    Dec 2019
    Nov 2019
    Oct 2019
    Sep 2019
    Aug 2019
    Jun 2019
    May 2019
    Apr 2019
    Mar 2019
    Feb 2019
    Jan 2019
    Dec 2018
    Nov 2018
    Aug 2018
    Jul 2018
    Jun 2018
    May 2018
    Apr 2018
    Mar 2018
    Feb 2018
    Dec 2017
    Nov 2017
    Oct 2017
    Sep 2017
    Aug 2017
    Jul 2017
    Jun 2017
    May 2017
    Apr 2017
    Mar 2017
    Feb 2017
    Jan 2017
    Dec 2016
    Nov 2016
    Oct 2016
    Sep 2016
    Aug 2016
    Jul 2016
    Jun 2016
    May 2016
    Apr 2016
    Mar 2016
    Feb 2016
    Jan 2016
    Dec 2015
    Nov 2015
    Oct 2015
    Sep 2015
    Aug 2015
    Jul 2015
    Jun 2015
    May 2015
    Apr 2015
    Mar 2015
    Feb 2015
    Jan 2015
    Dec 2014
    Nov 2014
    Oct 2014
    Sep 2014
    Aug 2014
    Jul 2014
    Jun 2014
    May 2014
    Apr 2014
    Mar 2014
    Feb 2014
    Jan 2014
    Dec 2013
    Nov 2013

    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Book Reviews
    Capital Gains Taxation
    Corporate Income Tax
    Consumption Taxes
    Economy - Long Term
    Economy - Short Term
    Environmental Regulation
    Last 100 Years
    Last 100 Years
    Real Estate Taxation

    Outside Links:

  • American Economic Alert
  • American Jobs Alliance
  • Angry Bear Blog
  • Economy in Crisis
  • Econbrowser
  • Emmanuel Goldstein's Blog
  • Levy Economics Institute
  • McKeever Institute
  • Michael Pettis Blog
  • Naked Capitalism
  • Natural Born Conservative
  • Science & Public Policy Inst.
  • Votersway Blog
  • Watt's Up With That


  • [An] extensive argument for balanced trade, and a program to achieve balanced trade is presented in Trading Away Our Future, by Raymond Richman, Howard Richman and Jesse Richman. “A minimum standard for ensuring that trade does benefit all is that trade should be relatively in balance.” [Balanced Trade entry]

    Journal of Economic Literature:

  • [Trading Away Our Future] Examines the costs and benefits of U.S. trade and tax policies. Discusses why trade deficits matter; root of the trade deficit; the “ostrich” and “eagles” attitudes; how to balance trade; taxation of capital gains; the real estate tax; the corporate income tax; solving the low savings problem; how to protect one’s assets; and a program for a strong America....

    Atlantic Economic Journal:

  • In Trading Away Our Future   Richman ... advocates the immediate adoption of a set of public policy proposal designed to reduce the trade deficit and increase domestic savings.... the set of public policy proposals is a wake-up call... [February 17, 2009 review by T.H. Cate]