Ideal Taxes Association

Raymond Richman       -       Jesse Richman       -       Howard Richman

 Richmans' Trade and Taxes Blog

The Current Minimum Wage May Cost Teenagers and Blacks More than $29 Billion!
Raymond Richman, 6/9/2014

Economists are divided on how much unemployment the minimum wage causes. About 70% or more of economists believe that a minimum wage decreases the demand for workers, especially unskilled workers. The demand for any worker depends on what the employer believes that hiring him would be worth to him. No employer will hire a worker unless he believes the worker will contribute as much value as the worker costs. Who is hurt the most? Teenagers and the unskilled who are unable to find jobs and those who patronize fast food restaurants, the less expensive hotels, and businesses catering to customers of the low and moderate income classes who are forced to pay higher prices for their necessities.

The unemployment statistics speak for themselves. Compare the unemployment rates of teenagers and the rest of those in the civilian labor force. The unemployment rate during the first quarter of 2014 was 6.5 percent for those 20 years of age and older but 20.9 percent for those aged 16 to 19. White teenagers had an unemployment rate of 20.9 percent, black teenagers 34.5 percent, Latin teenagers 24.4 percent and Asian 15.4 percent. The minimum wage laws affect blacks more than any group. Even in the population over 20 years of age, the black rate of unemployment was 11.5 percent compared to whites 5.7 percent.  It could be argued that the minimum wage laws affect blacks more than any other group.

Many classes of workers are not affected by a minimum wage law. Skilled workers produce a lot of value whereas unskilled workers produce a lesser amount of value. The wages of skilled are probably not affected at all by a minimum wage law.

Every class of labor is subject to the law of supply and demand, represented as a downward sloping demand curve and a supply curve that horizontal upward. The high wages of skilled labor is attributable to the fact that skilled labor is relatively scarce. How does a skilled laborer acquire his or her skills? Some by education and training, by schooling and technical education. Some by experience, by skills obtained by working on-the-job. The unskilled acquire skills on-the-job by training, observation and experience. Employers train unskilled workers to do some task that has value for them. The unskilled worker acquires a skill. Those who excel in the task are likely to be rewarded by training to do a job that creates even more value and is rewarded by increased pay. The process continues. Many foremen and managers started as unskilled workers. Workers have an incentive to acquire greater and greater skills.

All employers hire a variety of skills from mangers and skilled technicians to employees that do relatively simple tasks like cleaning up. Raising the minimum wage will cause all employers to economize on relatively unskilled workers.

Getting a first job is very important to an individual’s skill development. If one has to pay an unskilled worker an amount of money that exceeds the expected skill he is expected to acquire by on-the-job training in a reasonable time on the job, he will not hire. If wages of unskilled labor are very high, employers will be very reluctant to experiment and to employ additional workers whereas if wages are lower, employers will be more willing to take a chance on hiring.

Some employers can more easily pass on increased wage costs to consumers in the form of higher prices. Employers with a greater degree of monopoly power are more likely to be able to pass the increased cost of wages to their customers, whereas employers in highly competitive industries will be less able to pass the burden of increased costs to their customers.

If all employers in highly competitive industries have to pay the increased cost of a   minimum wage, then customers of even the competitive industries will have to bear the burden in the form of increased prices. But that will affect the competition between products. For example, the fast food industry and restaurants and hotels employ large numbers of unskilled workers, training them to do tasks like serving, cleaning, and so on. Raising the minimum wage will raise their costs and depending on the wealth of their clientele, they will be affected differently. Expensive restaurants and hotels will be affected little by a small rise in costs of relatively unskilled employees, whose pay is a small proportion of the price of their final product. Fast food and less-expensive restaurants will lose customers as some of their customers eat out less frequently. They will become less profitable and some may even close.

The minimum wage laws favor the rich and hurt the poor. That is why one hears so little protest for the chambers of commerce and from the labor unions. The latter are the principal proponents of minimum wage laws since they want to avoid competition from lesser paid workers.

A minimum wage of $5 is an annual wage of more than $10,000. If an employer cannot expect $10,000 of value-added, they will no hire the unskilled. When the minimum wage is $5, the employment of a teenager thus adds $10,000 per year to family income. Suppose reducing the minimum wage to $5/hour, 50% would have been employed. If only 50% of some 5,785,000 were employed during the 1st quarter of 2014, 2,891,000 would have been employed and their annual earnings would have amounted to $28.9 billion dollars. One can conclude that the national minimum wage of over $7.25 per hour has cost teen-agers nearly $29 billion and raising it to $10.00, will cost them even more.

Your Name:

Post a Comment:

  • Richmans' Blog    RSS
  • Our New Book - Balanced Trade
  • Buy Trading Away Our Future
  • Read Trading Away Our Future
  • Richmans' Commentaries
  • ITA Working Papers
  • ITA on Facebook
  • Contact Us

    Dec 2021
    Nov 2021
    Oct 2021
    Sep 2021
    May 2021
    Apr 2021
    Feb 2021
    Jan 2021
    Dec 2020
    Nov 2020
    Oct 2020
    Jul 2020
    Jun 2020
    May 2020
    Apr 2020
    Mar 2020
    Dec 2019
    Nov 2019
    Oct 2019
    Sep 2019
    Aug 2019
    Jun 2019
    May 2019
    Apr 2019
    Mar 2019
    Feb 2019
    Jan 2019
    Dec 2018
    Nov 2018
    Aug 2018
    Jul 2018
    Jun 2018
    May 2018
    Apr 2018
    Mar 2018
    Feb 2018
    Dec 2017
    Nov 2017
    Oct 2017
    Sep 2017
    Aug 2017
    Jul 2017
    Jun 2017
    May 2017
    Apr 2017
    Mar 2017
    Feb 2017
    Jan 2017
    Dec 2016
    Nov 2016
    Oct 2016
    Sep 2016
    Aug 2016
    Jul 2016
    Jun 2016
    May 2016
    Apr 2016
    Mar 2016
    Feb 2016
    Jan 2016
    Dec 2015
    Nov 2015
    Oct 2015
    Sep 2015
    Aug 2015
    Jul 2015
    Jun 2015
    May 2015
    Apr 2015
    Mar 2015
    Feb 2015
    Jan 2015
    Dec 2014
    Nov 2014
    Oct 2014
    Sep 2014
    Aug 2014
    Jul 2014
    Jun 2014

    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Book Reviews
    Capital Gains Taxation
    Corporate Income Tax
    Consumption Taxes
    Economy - Long Term

    Economy - Short Term
    Environmental Regulation
    Last 100 Years
    Real Estate Taxation

    Outside Links:

  • American Economic Alert
  • American Jobs Alliance
  • Angry Bear Blog
  • Economy in Crisis
  • Econbrowser
  • Emmanuel Goldstein's Blog
  • Levy Economics Institute
  • McKeever Institute
  • Michael Pettis Blog
  • Naked Capitalism
  • Natural Born Conservative
  • Science & Public Policy Inst.
  • Votersway Blog
  • Watt's Up With That


  • [An] extensive argument for balanced trade, and a program to achieve balanced trade is presented in Trading Away Our Future, by Raymond Richman, Howard Richman and Jesse Richman. “A minimum standard for ensuring that trade does benefit all is that trade should be relatively in balance.” [Balanced Trade entry]

    Journal of Economic Literature:

  • [Trading Away Our Future] Examines the costs and benefits of U.S. trade and tax policies. Discusses why trade deficits matter; root of the trade deficit; the “ostrich” and “eagles” attitudes; how to balance trade; taxation of capital gains; the real estate tax; the corporate income tax; solving the low savings problem; how to protect one’s assets; and a program for a strong America....

    Atlantic Economic Journal:

  • In Trading Away Our Future   Richman ... advocates the immediate adoption of a set of public policy proposal designed to reduce the trade deficit and increase domestic savings.... the set of public policy proposals is a wake-up call... [February 17, 2009 review by T.H. Cate]