Ideal Taxes Association

Raymond Richman       -       Jesse Richman       -       Howard Richman

 Richmans' Trade and Taxes Blog

Against the High Tech Luddites
Jesse Richman, 2/24/2017

Several of the United States' high technology billionaires have apparently recently fallen prey to the foolish arguments of neo-luddites.  For instance, Bill Gates has recently proposed a tax on robotic automation. Economists have rightly rejected these claims. Indeed, if we want to have rising incomes the best thing is for robots to take more jobs.  That's how we become more productive.  And ultimately how living standards can rise.  It is this kind of ingenuity which has kept Malthus' grim prognostications at bay in much of the world for the last two centuries.  

At the present moment, indeed, the US is facing a crisis of low productivity growth.  The robots are not being invested in rapidly enough.  The graph below shows the BLS estimate of non-farm productivity growth over time.  The last several years have been ones of low productivity growth.  The five year average rate of productivity increase is among the lowest in the time series.  


How will robots make us richer?  Let's consider the example of transportation.  Suppose that in a few years self-driving trucks become a reality.  With a self-driving truck, a truck driver will be able to operate the truck almost 24 hours a day.  Most of the time he or she will be sleeping or doing other things.  But when the load needs to be delivered or some unusual circumstance arises, the driver will take manual control.  The result will be a massive increase in the productivity of the trucking industry.  This will have two effects.  The price of shipping will drop.  And the profits of those operating the new more efficient trucks will increase.  The net result will be good for the economy.

Let's not listen to the neo-luddites, not even if they made billions in tech.  Bring on the robots!  

The key problem is not that we have too many robots or that rising productivity is taking jobs.  The data just doesn't support that notion.  As I've noted previously, the growth in China's urban manufacturing employment alone dwarfs the declines in US and other western manufacturing employment.  The robots are not the problem.  The problem is that not enough is being invested by US businesses in making US workers more productive through new technological advances and automation.  It is the construction of new plants, offices, trucks, and equipment using the best and most modern technology that will raise the incomes of US workers.   

Your Name:

Post a Comment:

Comment by Bruce Bishop, 2/27/2017:

When you export all of the labor intensive manufacturing,, what you have left is highly-automated manufacturing which, naturally, generates more value per hour of labor.  It is simple-minded to say that this represents an increase in productivity.  

Most of the automation and robotics, which displaced American factory workers, were in place by the mid-eighties, before any U.S. jobs were offshored to China.

The biggest breakthrough was Surface Mount Technology, where the old labor-intensive "through hole" stuffing of printed circuit boards was replaced by a high-speed "robot" that placed the components on the circuit board at blinding speed, and with near perfect accuracy.  This had become common by the mid eighties.  

The automatic spreading of fabric on forty foot tables, followed by computer guided cutting of the pattern pieces for apparel was around in 1979, as I saw it myself.  In 1982, I saw teachable robots painting poster sized cartoons of the Roadrunner, and Wiley Coyote, at a trade show.  That same year, I saw similar robots painting the tops of washing machines at the General Electric Appliance Park plant in Louisville, KY.

There is no way to automate the actual sewing of apparel.  It requires skilled operators, who possess a high degree of dexterity.  Likewise, there is no way to automate the assembly of complex devices involving many parts, or the threading and connecting of wires.  

As an Industrial Engineer for several Fortune 500 manufacturing companies, my focus was to look for, and to justify, the use of automation and robotics to reduce labor cost.  By 1985, we had squeezed as much labor out of manufacturing as possible.  It is only the theorists, who know nothing of manufacturing, who imagine a factory full of robots.

  • Richmans' Blog    RSS
  • Our New Book - Balanced Trade
  • Buy Trading Away Our Future
  • Read Trading Away Our Future
  • Richmans' Commentaries
  • ITA Working Papers
  • ITA on Facebook
  • Contact Us

    Dec 2021
    Nov 2021
    Oct 2021
    Sep 2021
    May 2021
    Apr 2021
    Feb 2021
    Jan 2021
    Dec 2020
    Nov 2020
    Oct 2020
    Jul 2020
    Jun 2020
    May 2020
    Apr 2020
    Mar 2020
    Dec 2019
    Nov 2019
    Oct 2019
    Sep 2019
    Aug 2019
    Jun 2019
    May 2019
    Apr 2019
    Mar 2019
    Feb 2019
    Jan 2019
    Dec 2018
    Nov 2018
    Aug 2018
    Jul 2018
    Jun 2018
    May 2018
    Apr 2018
    Mar 2018
    Feb 2018
    Dec 2017
    Nov 2017
    Oct 2017
    Sep 2017
    Aug 2017
    Jul 2017
    Jun 2017
    May 2017
    Apr 2017
    Mar 2017
    Feb 2017

    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Book Reviews
    Capital Gains Taxation
    Corporate Income Tax
    Consumption Taxes
    Economy - Long Term

    Economy - Short Term
    Environmental Regulation
    Last 100 Years
    Real Estate Taxation

    Outside Links:

  • American Economic Alert
  • American Jobs Alliance
  • Angry Bear Blog
  • Economy in Crisis
  • Econbrowser
  • Emmanuel Goldstein's Blog
  • Levy Economics Institute
  • McKeever Institute
  • Michael Pettis Blog
  • Naked Capitalism
  • Natural Born Conservative
  • Science & Public Policy Inst.
  • Votersway Blog
  • Watt's Up With That


  • [An] extensive argument for balanced trade, and a program to achieve balanced trade is presented in Trading Away Our Future, by Raymond Richman, Howard Richman and Jesse Richman. “A minimum standard for ensuring that trade does benefit all is that trade should be relatively in balance.” [Balanced Trade entry]

    Journal of Economic Literature:

  • [Trading Away Our Future] Examines the costs and benefits of U.S. trade and tax policies. Discusses why trade deficits matter; root of the trade deficit; the “ostrich” and “eagles” attitudes; how to balance trade; taxation of capital gains; the real estate tax; the corporate income tax; solving the low savings problem; how to protect one’s assets; and a program for a strong America....

    Atlantic Economic Journal:

  • In Trading Away Our Future   Richman ... advocates the immediate adoption of a set of public policy proposal designed to reduce the trade deficit and increase domestic savings.... the set of public policy proposals is a wake-up call... [February 17, 2009 review by T.H. Cate]