<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- RSS generated by perl scripts created by Howard B. Richman -->
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Richmans' Ideal Taxes Association Blog</title>
    <link>http://www.idealtaxes.com</link>
    <description>Commentary on trade and tax issues by the authors of Trading Away Our Future.</description>
    <language>en-us</language><item>
<title>Sarah Hall Ingram is being written out of the IRS scandal</title>
<link>http://www.idealtaxes.com/post3674.shtml</link>
<pubDate>19 Jun 2013 23:58:32 EST</pubDate>
<description>
&lt;font color='red'&gt;Howard Richman,                     6/19/2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sarah Hall Ingram is being written out of the IRS scandal. Take, for example, this selection from an article in today's &lt;em&gt;Insurance Journal&lt;/em&gt; which states:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some Republicans are also highlighting the fact that Sarah Hall Ingram, who heads the IRS health care office, oversaw the tax-exempt division when agents first started improperly targeting conservative groups. The IRS said Ingram was re-assigned to help the agency implement the health care law in December 2010, about six months before her subordinate learned about the targeting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The height of the scandal was January 2012 when, for the second time, a BOLO (&lt;em&gt;B&lt;/em&gt;e &lt;em&gt;O&lt;/em&gt;n the &lt;em&gt;L&lt;/em&gt;ook &lt;em&gt;O&lt;/em&gt;ut) list was instituted which specifically targeted groups whose names included words such as &quot;Tea Party.&quot; And Ingram was Commissioner of the relevant IRS division at that very time:...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Who ordered that targeting of Tea Party groups be resumed in May 2012?</title>
<link>http://www.idealtaxes.com/post3673.shtml</link>
<pubDate>18 Jun 2013 07:35:50 EST</pubDate>
<description>
&lt;font color='red'&gt;Howard Richman,                              6/17/2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to May 21 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/RSSc&quot;&gt;testimony before the Senate Finance Committee&lt;/a&gt;, in July 2011 IRS targeting of conservative groups for additional scrutiny was stopped, only to be resumed in May 2012. The initial targeting was blamed upon underlings in the Cincinnati IRS office. But, mysteriously, nobody at the IRS seems to know who ordered that targeting be resumed. Senator Pat Toomey (Republican, PA) questioned Acting IRS Commissioner Steven Miller about it (see the 2:07 mark):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Toomey: So we're sitting here in May of 2013. At this point, do you know who it is that initiated the policy of establishing these ideological criteria for creating this additional level of screening for applicants for C4 status?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Miller: It happened twice. The second time it happened, I don't think there is clarity on that. The first time I think there's more clarity on that....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Why the IRS scandal is worse than the others</title>
<link>http://www.idealtaxes.com/post3672.shtml</link>
<pubDate>17 Jun 2013 17:19:01 EST</pubDate>
<description>
&lt;font color='red'&gt;Howard Richman,         6/16/2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In today's Baltimore Sun, former Maryland Governor Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr., (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bs-ed-ehrlich-irs-20130616,0,6184547.column&quot;&gt;Why the IRS scandal is worse than the others&lt;/a&gt;) lists several reasons why the IRS scandal is worse than the others, one of which is that the IRS targeted conservative groups:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And the granddaddy of them all: irrefutable evidence the Obama IRS targeted conservative groups for special investigation smack dab in the middle of a tense presidential campaign. And at a time the president and his surrogates were running around the country complaining about the rise of the tea party and other similarly situated organizations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This was an &quot;in your face&quot; operation: groups associated with the major conservative causes of the day (fiscal restraint, tax reform, marriage, pro-life) all came in for extraordinary (and highly questionable) scrutiny by certain alleged &quot;rogue&quot; personnel within the IRS in Cincinnati, Washington state or both. Only time and future investigation will tell how far up the chain the miscreant trail will lead, but I'm betting this was not simply a basement operation confined to &quot;The River City.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Parenthetically, Ehrlich notes the flippant answer given by IRS Commissioner Douglas Schulman when asked about his many trips to the White House:...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
