Ideal Taxes Association

Raymond Richman       -       Jesse Richman       -       Howard Richman

 Richmans' Trade and Taxes Blog

Our Pharmaceutical Industry needs Surgical Mask Protection -- we're published in American Thinker this morning
Howard Richman, 3/19/2020

by Jesse Richman and Howard Richman

Search Amazon today for face masks and the product will be unavailable, dramatically marked up, and/or shipping from China. In the face of the Coronavirus pandemic, masks are an essential component of the equipment medical professionals need but one that some hospital systems are also struggling to procure. And if they were widely available, face masks could potentially help Americans reduce the risk of infection as well, since one of the main infection pathways is through breathing the virus in, and masks substantially reduce exposure.

One of the reasons why masks have been in short supply in the U.S. is inevitable – any time there is a major pandemic involving a respiratory infection, there will be mask shortages. Part of it also involves decisions about trade policy that have systematically made the U.S. more vulnerable to political, economic, and health shocks.

Twenty years ago, most medical masks used in the U.S. were produced in the U.S., about 95 percent. Today, it’s about five percent. Most of the rest are made in China, which became a particularly big problem when China was the first country to largely go off-line economically as a result of efforts to fight the Coronavirus epidemic. With little domestic production capacity, the U.S. is at the mercy of China’s ability to manage its supply chain, and dependent upon the good graces of a Chinese government that might well choose to prioritize domestic use of masks in a time of shortage. Mask production is also surprisingly high-tech and capital intensive with million dollar machines involved in making them.

But masks are just one example. In the U.S. medicine shortages are also likely if China’s economy remains largely shut-down because most pharmaceutical manufacturing capability has been shipped overseas, and much of that capability has been shipped to China. China seems aware of the power this gives it in the marketplace, and there are some indications it might threaten to cut off medical supplies in order to pressure the U.S..

On Monday Peter Navarro, trade policy advisor to President Trump, proposed a policy to begin doing something about this, an executive order mandating U.S. content standards for medical supplies purchased by the Federal government. This is a step in the right direction, and should be put in place as soon as possible. It would potentially help address the problem that surviving U.S. manufacturers are reluctant to make major capital investments to meet what they think will be a short-term spike in demand.

As we think about U.S. medical supply policy, and indeed U.S. trade policy more broadly, we should keep in mind three principles:

  1. Trade should be balanced. In 2019 the U.S. imported $866 billion dollars more goods than it exported. Across many areas of the economy, the result is less jobs producing things Americans need, and more debt to finance purchases from abroad, which has transformed the U.S. into the world’s largest debtor. Almost a tenth of that deficit is due to the U.S. dependence on important pharmaceuticals.
  2. Goods in any category should come from many sources. If 95 percent of face masks were imported, but five percent came from each of 19 different countries spread across the globe, the risk to supply would be much smaller. We should seek to discourage overreliance on any one supplier.
  3. Either production capacity or reserves need to be larger. Until sufficient productive capacity comes online, reserve supplies should be maintained for critical medical, energy, and high technology goods. Where there is not presently sufficient domestic productive capacity, tariffs should be levied on imports and reserve stockpiles should be expanded.

Balancing trade and reshoring production of medicine and other medical supplies to the U.S. would potentially generate a major economic boost. A recent study by the Coalition for a Prosperous America estimated that doing so would produce more than 800,000 jobs. As the U.S. faces both health and economic risks associated with the pandemic that began in Wuhan China, actions by both the President and Congress to bring back significant pharmaceutical production to the U.S. are both long overdue, and just what the doctor ordered.

Your Name:

Post a Comment:

  • Richmans' Blog    RSS
  • Our New Book - Balanced Trade
  • Buy Trading Away Our Future
  • Read Trading Away Our Future
  • Richmans' Commentaries
  • ITA Working Papers
  • ITA on Facebook
  • Contact Us

    May 2021
    Apr 2021
    Feb 2021
    Jan 2021
    Dec 2020
    Nov 2020
    Oct 2020
    Jul 2020
    Jun 2020
    May 2020
    Apr 2020
    Mar 2020

    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Book Reviews
    Capital Gains Taxation
    Corporate Income Tax
    Consumption Taxes
    Economy - Long Term
    Economy - Short Term
    Environmental Regulation
    Last 100 Years
    Real Estate Taxation


    Outside Links:

  • American Economic Alert
  • American Jobs Alliance
  • Angry Bear Blog
  • Economy in Crisis
  • Econbrowser
  • Emmanuel Goldstein's Blog
  • Levy Economics Institute
  • McKeever Institute
  • Michael Pettis Blog
  • Naked Capitalism
  • Natural Born Conservative
  • Science & Public Policy Inst.
  • Votersway Blog
  • Watt's Up With That


  • [An] extensive argument for balanced trade, and a program to achieve balanced trade is presented in Trading Away Our Future, by Raymond Richman, Howard Richman and Jesse Richman. “A minimum standard for ensuring that trade does benefit all is that trade should be relatively in balance.” [Balanced Trade entry]

    Journal of Economic Literature:

  • [Trading Away Our Future] Examines the costs and benefits of U.S. trade and tax policies. Discusses why trade deficits matter; root of the trade deficit; the “ostrich” and “eagles” attitudes; how to balance trade; taxation of capital gains; the real estate tax; the corporate income tax; solving the low savings problem; how to protect one’s assets; and a program for a strong America....

    Atlantic Economic Journal:

  • In Trading Away Our Future   Richman ... advocates the immediate adoption of a set of public policy proposal designed to reduce the trade deficit and increase domestic savings.... the set of public policy proposals is a wake-up call... [February 17, 2009 review by T.H. Cate]